• sitemap
  • blog
  • contact
  • CPAs: Join Us!
Home
The Web Site of the New York State Society of CPAs

NYSSCPA Legacy Menu

  • About Us
    • Society Overview
    • Membership Center
    • Chapters
    • Committees
    • Governance
    • Society Officers
    • Press Room
    • Staff Directory
    • NYSSCPA Jobs
  • Continuing Education
    • FAE Conferences
    • Course Catalog
    • Registration Form
    • About FAE Events
    • FAE Registration Rules
    • Technical Sessions
    • POP 2010
    • CPE Requirements
    • FAE On-site Learning
    • Connect with Peers
    • N.Y. CPE Changes
    • Self Study
    • School Official Training
    • Online CPE: Webcasts and Webinars
  • Future CPAs
    • High School Students
    • College Students
    • CPA Candidates
    • COAP
    • FAQs
    • Teacher's Network
    • CPA High School Outreach
    • Career Opportunities Online
    • Become a CPA
  • Gov't Affairs
    • NY Reform Law
    • Legislation
    • Contact Representatives
    • Legislative/Governmental Links
    • CPA PAC
    • Legislation Archives
  • Industry
    • Overview
    • Committee Corner
    • Committee Meeting Schedule
    • Conferences Schedule
    • Articles and Technical FAQs
  • Professional Resources
    • Accounting Standards
    • Accounting Terminology Guide
    • Auditing
    • Sound Advice
    • Useful Links
    • Ethics & Regulation
    • Peer Review
    • Risk Mgt. & Liability Guidebook
    • Society Comment Letters
    • Exposure Drafts
    • 360 Degrees Financial Literacy
    • Prof. Ethics Resource Center
    • IFRS Information
  • Society Pubs.
    • The CPA Journal
    • The Trusted Professional
    • Publication Subscriptions
    • CPA Journal Media Kit
    • Subscribe to the E-zine
    • CPA Journal Resource Guide
    • Trusted Professional Media Kit
    • NYSSCPA.org Ad Rates
  • Tax Resources
    • Tax Forms
    • Federal Taxation
    • State & Local Taxation
    • Tax News
Home Blog March, 2010 Ethics

RSS FEED

Syndicate content

Help

RECENT COMMENTS

  • It would not suprise me. I
    Anonymous
    09/07/2010 - 12:09
  • Sales Tax
    Elliot Schwartz
    08/31/2010 - 10:06
  • Was Herz pushed out?
    Anonymous
    08/26/2010 - 10:47
  • Think he was pushed out?
    Anonymous
    08/24/2010 - 17:25
  • Rangel
    Anonymous
    07/30/2010 - 16:15

RECENT ENTRIES

  • Accountant Caught Scalping U.S. Open Tix
  • Jobless Rate Showed Little Change in August
  • Madoff Auditor Sentencing Postponed Until March
  • CPA Member Vote Needed on Proposed NYSSCPA Bylaws Changes
  • Law Amendment Changes Powers of Attorney Rule
  • GAO 2nd in Best Places to Work List
  • NYS Comptroller to Investigate MTA for Potential Overtime Fraud
  • PERAB Releases Tax Reform Report
  • Congressmen Concerned About New PTIN Rule
  • NYSSCPA Members in the News

BY SUBJECT

  • Uncategorized (7)
  • Accountability (307)
  • Accountancy Reform Law (9)
  • AICPA (13)
  • Auditing (62)
  • Big Four (12)
  • CPA Exam (3)
  • CPA Profiles (4)
  • CPAs in Industry (18)
  • CPE (19)
  • Ethics (77)
  • FASB (39)
  • Federal (48)
  • Financial Crisis (187)
  • GASB (5)
  • IASB (13)
  • IFRS (17)
  • Information Technology (11)
  • IRS (105)
  • Just for Fun (35)
  • Legislation (61)
  • New York State (147)
  • NYSSCPA Members in the News (4)
  • NYSSCPA News (112)
  • PCAOB (35)
  • Peer Review (3)
  • Personal Financial Planning (17)
  • Regulatory Activities (135)
  • SEC (124)
  • Tax Reform (17)

ARCHIVE

  • September 2010 (6)
  • August 2010 (53)
  • July 2010 (42)
  • June 2010 (50)
  • May 2010 (34)
  • April 2010 (45)
  • March 2010 (53)
  • February 2010 (29)
  • January 2010 (27)
  • December 2009 (27)

BLOG ROLL

  • Sense on Cents
  • FEI Financial Reporting Blog
  • re: The Auditors
  • Re:Balance
  • Tick Marks
  • Golden Practices
  • The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Forum
  • Footnoted.org
  • CFO Blog
  • Securities Docket
  • The Summa
  • The Accounting Onion

Democrats to Pass Health Bill Using Reconciliation

Submitted by Chris Gaetano on Wed, 03/03/2010 - 17:06
  • Ethics
  • Taxes

Senate Democrats plan to use the obscure parliamentary procedure known as reconciliation to circumvent a potential Republican filibuster and pass the health care reform bill with a simple majority. The news comes from Sen. Tom Harkin (D – Iowa) who said that the House will need to pass the Senate’s version of the health care bill (the one that passed in December) after the Senate has assured House leaders that there are enough voted to pass the measure via reconciliation. After the house passes the Senate’s bill, both chambers will then pass a separate reconciliation measure to revise it. Harkin, incidentally, said that there are indeed enough votes in the Senate to pass the legislation as is; in a previous interview on MSNBC, however, he noted that should a public option come into play, he fears that it would lose support and imperil the entire bill.

This plan has the support of President Barack Obama, whose top aides have said that the Democrats will definitely proceed with reconciliation. Obama, in a speech devoted to the health care overhaul today, urged lawmakers “to finish their work and schedule a vote in the next few weeks.”

Republicans are not amused by this turn of events and have already begun organizing its opposition to the legislation. Further, they’ve begun to voice concerns that the Senate Parliamentarian, a little-known man named Alan Frumin who acts, effectively, as the Senate referee, may not be trusted to remain impartial when considering whether reconciliation is allowed in this case. Though four Republican ideas have been incorporated into the plan, the GOP has already derided this as insufficient, adding that the bi-partisan overtures amount to naught more than political cover.

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Delicious Delicious
  • Digg Digg
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Technorati Technorati
  • Add new comment
  • Email this Blog entryEmail this Blog entry
  • Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version

Reconciliation

Submitted by John Lauchert (not verified) on Sun, 03/07/2010 - 11:23.

It is with disbelief that these remarks are penned. The American people have made clear the following: 1) there is something wrong with our health care system that needs to be fixed, and 2) the proposal of the Administration that has been pushed to its current point in our legislative process is undesirable. The use of reconciliation to further its objectives will result in a response that the President has suggested when saying "that is what elections are for". The arrogance displayed by pushing the process tells the American people "we know what is good for you". The cave in to the union element is only a beginning of the unraveling of the fix. There is much more unraveling to come. I guess that what elections are for!

  • reply

The New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants (NYSSCPA) encourages you to add a comment to this discussion.  You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law.  Please note that NYSSCPA reviews all comments prior to posting. NYSSCPA may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material.  All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors. To view the full “NYSSCPA Blog Terms and Conditions,” click here.

  • Search   |
  • Site Map   |
  • Become a Member   |
  • CareerBank   |
  • Press Room   |
  • Classifieds   |
  • Contact Us

Copyright 2010 New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants. Legal Notices